Home Home Home

Automated vehicles: Monitoring the people inside

April 22, 2015

Enhancements to UMTRI driving simulator allow researchers to study human behavior in the context of automated driving

Push a small button on the steering wheel of UMTRI’s driving simulator, and a voice announces, “Automated mode engaged.” The instrument cluster takes on a green background, and the car centers itself in the lane and cruises forward at a steady speed. The steering wheel turns by itself to keep the vehicle in the lane during curves and turns.

While the vehicle “self-drives” through the simulated urban landscape, UMTRI assistant research scientist Anuj K. Pradhan explains that progress toward fully automated vehicles is happening rapidly, but there are many unknowns and some major hurdles to be addressed.

“Some of the pressing issues are those related to human factors,” says Pradhan, who is part of the UMTRI Young Driver Behavior and Injury Prevention Group. “Until vehicles are fully automated, 100-percent of the time, humans will still play an active and important role in the driving loop. So for automation levels 2 and 3, the human factor is critical.”

According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, a fully automated vehicle allowing unmanned operation is designated as level 4. In level 3, a vehicle is essentially self-driving and controls all safety-critical functions but may need humans in various situations that would require transition back to driver control. Level 2 automation represents combinations of multiple functions that enable a car to drive itself but require constant monitoring by the driver with potentially rapid transitioning between automated and human control. (See the NHTSA policy on automated vehicle development.)

These transitions may not be as simple as they sound.

“When you’re driving (normally), one is expected to possess a certain degree of situational awareness, especially with regard to the driving scene, traffic flow, and other driving related factors,” explains Pradhan. “But when a vehicle is in automated mode, the person inside may be reading, texting, or even napping. He or she may not be prepared to suddenly and safely take control of the vehicle when control is handed back from the automation.”

So the question for researchers is this: How can you safely and economically conduct empirical research to better understand the human-factors issues inherent in automated driving? One approach is to do vehicle testing in an off-roadway setting, such as M City. Given that access to self-driving cars even for research purposes is very limited, an alternate approach is to use high-fidelity driving simulators with automated-vehicle capabilities, such as the one at UMTRI.

With seed funding from U-M’s Mobility Transformation Center (MTC) and in collaboration with industrial partner Realtime Technologies Inc., Pradhan is working with programmer Christopher Atkins and lead electronics engineer Mark Gilbert to enhance UMTRI’s driving simulator to provide different levels of automated-driving capabilities. The software and hardware enhancements will provide for various customizations and experimental setups and designs that will allow researchers to study human behavior in the context of automated driving with a high degree of ecological and internal validity.

“The driving simulator, as is, is a very powerful and versatile tool that is used to study driver behavior," says Pradhan. "By adding self-driving capabilities, it allows us to significantly extend human-factors research on vehicle automation and to start examining a host of new questions that have been raised about vehicle automation in relation to the human driver or operator.”

Pradhan gives some examples of issues related to transfer of control:

  • How do people react when control of the vehicle is transferred back to them from automation during different circumstances? How does this differ if the driver is already monitoring the roadway versus engaged in something else?
  • How do individual driver characteristics (such as age or experience) affect behaviors related to automation, including acceptance of technology, and expectations of automation? Are alerts related to transfer of control best relayed by single or multiple modes (audio and seat vibrations) depending on the driver’s age or experience?

In a related project recently awarded by the MTC, Pradhan will examine these types of behavioral issues and gain a better understanding of the role that the driver’s attentional state plays during vehicle automation. “It appears that when a human is in a self-driving car, it becomes important for the automation to also monitor the driver,” says Pradhan. “That’s the next step.”

By Joyce Daniels, UMTRI